Another Technoscience is Possible
Another Technoscience is Possible: Agricultural Lessons for the Posthumanities
edited by Gabriela Mendez Cota
Introduction
When Foucault introduced the concept of biopolitics he referred to a historically specific power agenda involving a particular approach to life. This approach was at the root of the modern sciences of biology and political economy, both of which set out to describe, explain and manage their objects of study as abstract processes of production and reproduction. Agricultural science must be situated in relation to the biopolitical agenda of 'applying' the modern scientific approach to the management of social life. The scientification of agriculture took place in the United States towards the end of the 19th century through a process that entailed both a delegitimation of farmer-generated knowledges and the production of new, modern subjectivities. As farmers became entrepreneurs in need of scientific education and advice, newly trained agronomists devoted themselves to designing fertilizers, pesticides and hybrid seeds with the goal of maximizing yields. Public institutions were created which coordinated agricultural production with both science and trade policy. Agricultural science was thus inseparable from the process which transformed much of US agriculture into transnational agribusiness, and local farming networks all over the world into consumer endpoints of a globalized food industry. More
Altieri, M. A. (2001) 'Fatal harvest: old and new dimensions of the ecological tragedy of modern agriculture', Journal of Business Administration and Policy Analysis 30-31: http://agroecology.pbworks.com/f/Altieri-NEMETZ.pdf,
last access 17/08/2011.
Cooper, M. (2008) Life as Surplus. Biotechnology & Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle & London: University of Washington Press.
Escobar, A. (1995) Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Esteva, G. (1994) 'Re-embedding Food in Agriculture', Culture and Agriculture 48: 2-12.
Esteva, G. (1996) 'Hosting the Otherness of the Other: The Case of the Green Revolution', in Marglin, F. & Marglin, S. (eds), Decolonizing knowledge: from development to dialogue. Oxford: Clarendon.
Franklin, S. (2000) 'Life Itself: Global Nature and the Genetic Imaginary', in Franklin, S. et al Global Nature, Global Culture. London: Sage.
González, R. J. (2001) Zapotec Science; Farming and Food in the Northern Sierra of Oaxaca. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Haraway, D. (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan'_Meets_OncoMouse 'Feminism and Technoscience. London: Routledge.
Kloppenburg, J. (2009) 'Social theory and the de/reconstruction of agricultural science: local knowledge for an alternative agriculture', in Henderson, G. & Waterstone, M. (eds), Geographic Thought. A Praxis Perspective. London: Routledge.
Kloppenburg, J. (2010) 'Seed Sovereignty. The Promise of Open Source Biology', in Wittman, H. et al (eds), Food Sovereignty. Reconnecting Food, Nature, and Community. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.
Thacker, E. 2005. The Global Genome. Biotechnology, Politics, and Culture. London & Cambridge: MIT Press.
</div>